World Nutrition

Volume 3, Number 4, April 2012

Journal of the World Public Health Nutrition Association
Published monthly at

The Association is an affiliated body of the International Union of Nutritional Sciences For membership and for other contributions, news, columns and services, go to:


Ready to use therapeutic food is not the solution to malnutrition

Access pdf of February 2011 editorial here
Access pdf of February 2011 commentary here
Access pdf of February 2011 correspondence here
Access pdf of March 2011 correspondence here

Sir, This letter follows the coverage and correspondence on ready to use therapeutic food (RUTF) that appeared in the February and March 2011 issues of World Nutrition. We are writing to express our deep concern over the pressure on countries by international organisations like UN bodies and donors, to work collaboratively with problematic companies, to use RUTF in the management and even the prevention of malnutrition. We also propose some solutions to manage severe forms of malnutrition.

In his 26 December 2011 Report to the UN General Assembly (1), the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food states that 'When ecosystems are able to support sustainable diets, nutrition programmes, policies and interventions supporting the use of supplements, RUTF [ready-to-use therapeutic foods], fortificants and infant formulas, are inappropriate and can lead to malnutrition, and ... the marketing of these food substitutes and related products can contribute to major public health problems'. We agree.

The term 'ready to use therapeutic food' refers to several varieties of ready to eat foods, ranging from those prepared from locally available foods by village women in their own self-help groups for the malnourished children in their village, to those prepared according to specific formulas in factories to be shipped all over the world. The term now almost always refers to the latter, and specifically a peanut and milk- powder based spread with specified amounts of micronutrients, providing energy equivalent to 520-550Kcal/100g, produced by companies such as Valid Nutrition (Malawi), Nutriset (France) and Insta EPZ (Kenya). Even 'local' production, when mentioned these days, refers to centralised production with technical oversight, usually at the national or sub-national level, something which cannot be replicated at the village level. For example, Insta EPZ has an annual RUTF production capacity of 4,500 tonnes (2).

An increasing number of large and medium sized companies are now entering the malnutrition market. Besides the seven global corporations and an equal number of national corporations selling RUTF to UNICEF (3), other corporations are supplying their products across the world though USAID and other donor organisations. There is even talk of giving incentives to food companies to develop RUTF (4). Valid Nutrition describes itself as 'a business in that it aims to earn revenue and profit although these profits are re-invested in the business in pursuit of its social mission' (5).

Why is the commercial sector willing to invest in setting up manufacturing units that may be closed after say one decade if, as we all hope, severe forms of child malnutrition are then eliminated? There is already evidence that programmes using RUTF do not decrease its prevalence (6). Nevertheless the market is growing. UNICEF's forecast for purchase of RUTF for 2012 is 28,000 tonnes, up from 23,000 tonnes in 2009-10 (7).

Trade-driven policies and interventions based on a product are market-centred and not people-centred. People-centred strategies, that empower people to eliminate malnutrition, are those that address the social determinants of malnutrition – such as rising food prices; loss of livelihoods; privatisation of or reduced access to community resources of land, water, seeds, and forests; feminisation of labour, particularly in the unorganised sector where there is little or no maternity protection; increased costs of health care; climate change; and deregulation of trade and commerce.

The UN's framework for child malnutrition dating from 1990, which identified these determinants, seems to have been lost in the push for RUTF. Chronic malnutrition is a symbol of the denial of the human right to adequate food. This is defined by the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food in 2002 as being 'inherent in all people, to have regular, permanent and unrestricted access, either directly or by means of financial purchases, to quantitatively and qualitatively adequate and sufficient food corresponding to the cultural traditions of people to which the consumer belongs, and which ensures a physical and mental, individual and collective fulfilling and dignified life free of fear'.

Strategies to address malnutrition should protect people's livelihoods; provide equitable and 100 per cent coverage and access to adequate food, to safe water and sanitation to primary health care, to full support of optimal breastfeeding and of growth monitoring.

Malnutrition, especially chronic malnutrition, is the result of a complex set of factors resulting in a lack of access to adequate food and a loss of nutrients from preventable diseases. Therefore the sustainable management of malnutrition also requires a comprehensive set of responses primarily geared to ensure this access. The RUTF approach fails to address these factors. This is obvious.

We therefore respectfully suggest

Chronic malnutrition in children, in the numbers seen today, is glaring evidence of glaring inequities in access to food, both globally and nationally. Ready to use therapeutic food does not address these inequities. It should be used in emergencies, but it is not the solution to malnutrition.

Arun Gupta
Chair, Global Breastfeeding Initiative for Child Survival
International Baby Food Action Network ,

Claudio Schuftan
People's Health Movement

Flavio Valente
Chair, FoodFirst Information and Action Network (FIAN)

Patti Rundall
Policy Director, Baby Milk Action

Radha Holla
Campaign Coordinator, Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India
International Baby Food Action Network, Asia

Please cite as: A, Schuftan C, Valente F, Rundall P, Holla R. Ready to use therapeutic food is not the solution to malnutrition. [Letter] World Nutrition, April 2012,3, 3: 168-171. Obtainable at


  1. Report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Olivier De Schutter, December 26, 2011.Obtainable at
  2. USAID. Saving Lives One Packet at a Time - Increasing Regional Food, 16 September 2011. Obtainable at Article/2858/Saving_Lives_One_Packet_at_a Time
  3. Komrska J. Overview of UNICEF's RUTF Procurement in 2010 and past years. Presentation made at consultation with RUTF suppliers, Copenhagen, 18 October 2010. Obtainable at: of_UNICEF_RUTF_Procurement_in_2010.pdf
  4. The global game plan of Big Snack. [Editorial] World Nutrition, February 2011, 2, 2: 55- 61. Obtainable at
  5. Jeremy Shoham (2010). Valid Nutrition. Field Exchange 39, September 2010. Obtainable at
  7. 2011-2012 Tender Overview. Consultation with RUTF Suppliers. Copenhagen, 18 October 2010. Chief, Medicines and Nutrition Centre, UNICEF Supply Division. Obtainable at

2012 April. WN6. Correspondence
Ready to use therapeutic food is not the answer to malnutrition

Respond below please

security code
Enter Security Code:


World Nutrition



Folic acid and
spina bifida

Mark Lawrence
Access cover, contents here
Access editorial here


The Food System

Big Food bitten

Geoffrey Cannon
Access commentary here


Philip James

From Cairo

Moving on to 2015-2025
How to work with industry

Click here

Geoffrey Cannon

From São Paulo

The five dimensions of nutrition
It is best to be small

Click here

Claudio Schuftan

From Bangkok

A tale of three meetings
How nice to meet Dr Nabarro

Click here

Reggie Annan

From Kumasi

Cancer in Africa:
Prevention and control

Click here

April issue
Out on 1 April


New book


Michael Pollan

Available on 1 April